This was already present for the other architectures. I think we skipped
this because glibc seems to have an incorrect definition (int rather than
long), but the kernel has the sane definition (just not in a uapi header).
Change-Id: I0d47a424b505804389853dd8632693dad55a3907
Upstream has implemented lgammal/lgammal_r for ld128, and fixed the
sign problem we reported with all the lgamma*_r functions and -0.
Bug: 17471883
Change-Id: Ibb175d9cab67efae75f1010796fd44c9ba6ce4fc
From C99 standard: “The nextafter functions determine the next representable value, in the type of the function,
after x in the direction of y, where x and y are first converted to the type of the function”.
The next representable value of 0.0 in direction of -1.0 is -4.9406564584124654e-324, not 0.0.
Similar thing holds for nextafterf, nextafterl, nexttowardf, nexttoward, and nexttowardl.
The tests pass either way, since the error is within the tolerance, but how it is written is wrong.
Change-Id: I1338eeffe3de8031a48f46e1b07146bc07dc2f0a
Signed-off-by: Jingwei Zhang <jingwei.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingwei Shi <mingwei.shi@intel.com>
Other changes to support the new headers:
- Remove the flock64 structure it is defined in the new headers.
- Update the syscalls to correspond with the headers.
Change-Id: I49a6b07e8b2bfffb67be71b07b58e4e6848fcc09
gdb was happy with what we had, but libgcc and libunwind weren't.
libgcc is happy with the kernel's restorer (because of the extra nop),
though libunwind looks like it's going to need code changes regardless.
We could make our restorer more like the kernel's one, but why bother
when we can just let the kernel supply the canonical one?
Bug: 17436734
Change-Id: I330fa5e68f23b1cf8133aa552896657b0b873ed3
From the elf-spec: "Symbolically bound shared objects are
identified by the .dynamic entry DT_SYMBOLIC. This tag is
informational only; the runtime linker processes symbol
lookups from these objects in the same manner as any
other object."
Change-Id: I4aae0e502ed9fac096fbf076f4d6b2e055d784f6
Benchmarks for the following sequences:
1) pthread_rwlock_rdlock -> pthread_rwlock_unlock
2) pthread_rwlock_wrlock -> pthread_rwlock_unlock
Change-Id: I8d87d4d8afab8637ea7ff5d23a0b3a81d6d40835
Symbols from libraries opened with RTLD_LOCAL (default)
should not be visible via dlsym(RLTD_DEFAULT/RTLD_NEXT, .)
Bug: 17512583
Change-Id: I1758943081a67cf3d49ba5808e061b8251a91964
* LP32 should use sa_restorer too. gdb expects this, and future (>= 3.15) x86
kernels will apparently stop supporting the case where SA_RESTORER isn't
set.
* gdb and libunwind care about the exact instruction sequences, so we need to
modify the code slightly in a few cases to match what they're looking for.
* gdb also cares about the exact function names (for some architectures),
so we need to use __restore and __restore_rt rather than __sigreturn and
__rt_sigreturn.
* It's possible that we don't have a VDSO; dl_iterate_phdr shouldn't assume
that getauxval(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR) will return a non-null pointer.
This fixes unwinding through a signal handler in gdb for all architectures.
It doesn't fix libunwind for arm and arm64. I'll keep investigating that...
Bug: 17436734
Change-Id: Ic1ea1184db6655c5d96180dc07bcc09628e647cb
It looks like the file comment was copy-pasted from ctime. Fixed filename in comment to "math.h".
Change-Id: I27b0c2a7827076a91fc7b63913fad6eee4d6a79e
Signed-off-by: m4tx <m4tx@m4tx.pl>
Elliott Hughes
Dan Albert
Christopher Ferris
Jingwei Zhang
Dmitriy Ivanov
Calin Juravle
m4tx