s/riscv/riscv64/
Unlike the kernel script (where plain "riscv" was correct because that's what the kernel uses, making no distinction between riscv32 and riscv64 in the uapi header directories), this should say "riscv64" because that's what our build system uses. (This wasn't caught because we haven't wired up the .bp file yet.) Test: treehugger Change-Id: I086aaa89e69bf4ddc484a7e93a6c413fd8c719ff
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f16769da6
commit
28a644594b
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
|||
import sys
|
||||
|
||||
def has_arch_tags(tags):
|
||||
for arch in ["arm", "arm64", "riscv", "x86", "x86_64"]:
|
||||
for arch in ["arm", "arm64", "riscv64", "x86", "x86_64"]:
|
||||
if arch in tags:
|
||||
return True
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue