From 28a644594b31335ffc8477f6738436636cb9b67b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elliott Hughes Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:17:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] s/riscv/riscv64/ Unlike the kernel script (where plain "riscv" was correct because that's what the kernel uses, making no distinction between riscv32 and riscv64 in the uapi header directories), this should say "riscv64" because that's what our build system uses. (This wasn't caught because we haven't wired up the .bp file yet.) Test: treehugger Change-Id: I086aaa89e69bf4ddc484a7e93a6c413fd8c719ff --- tools/generate-version-script.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/generate-version-script.py b/tools/generate-version-script.py index 206b91b54..fab46b934 100755 --- a/tools/generate-version-script.py +++ b/tools/generate-version-script.py @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import sys def has_arch_tags(tags): - for arch in ["arm", "arm64", "riscv", "x86", "x86_64"]: + for arch in ["arm", "arm64", "riscv64", "x86", "x86_64"]: if arch in tags: return True return False