From e7edfbc91614ad246abfe187b6a68db0ffdf9882 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elliott Hughes Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:09:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Make the udev vs plugdev distinction a bit clearer. Bug: http://b/162109763 Test: treehugger Change-Id: Id392d0d87dd6ba098382436062b90e3a5ed79025 --- diagnose_usb/diagnose_usb.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/diagnose_usb/diagnose_usb.cpp b/diagnose_usb/diagnose_usb.cpp index 5695ecec5..35edb5e05 100644 --- a/diagnose_usb/diagnose_usb.cpp +++ b/diagnose_usb/diagnose_usb.cpp @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static std::string GetUdevProblem() { // additionally just to be sure. if (group_member(plugdev_group->gr_gid) || getegid() == plugdev_group->gr_gid) { // The user is in plugdev so the problem is likely with the udev rules. - return "user in plugdev group; are your udev rules wrong?"; + return "missing udev rules? user is in the plugdev group"; } passwd* pwd = getpwuid(getuid()); return android::base::StringPrintf("user %s is not in the plugdev group",